PISKUNOVA E.P., KUZIBETSKIY I.A. Analysis of the Dynamics of the Results of the Unified State Exam in History in the Volgograd Region in 2021–2024
- Details
- Hits: 23
- item->id; ?>
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2025.1.13
Elena P. Piskunova
Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor, Department of History and International Relations, Chairperson of the Regional Subject Commission of the Unified State Exam in History, Volgograd State University, Prosp. Universitetsky, 100, 400062 Volgograd, Russian Federation,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-8094
Igor A. Kuzibetskiy, Candidate of Sciences (Pedagogy), Vice-Rector for Education Quality, Director of the Regional Information Processing Center, Volgograd State Academy of Postgraduate Education, Novodvinskaya St, 19А, 400012 Volgograd, Russian Federation,
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6776-5552
Abstract. Introduction. For the last four years, the content of the Unified State Exam in History was constantly changing. The purpose of these changes was to identify knowledge, skills, and abilities in the most objective form, to get away from the mechanical memorization of the material, and to achieve the manifestation of creative, analytical, and logical abilities of graduates. Methods and materials. The results of the Unified State Exam in History, demonstrated by the students of the Volgograd region in the 2021–2024 years, give the understanding of the received skills. Analysis. An analysis of the fulfillment of controlling and measuring materials tasks by graduates of the Volgograd region allows us to conclude that the main dates, facts, processes, and phenomena of the history of Russia constitute the most successfully acquired knowledge, as well as the ability to search for information in written sources and the simplest skills of working with a historical map. The greatest difficulty for graduates is represented by tasks on the ability to use historical information for argumentation and analysis, tasks for working with images, and tasks that test the knowledge of historical personalities. Results. Comparing the results over several years allows us to come to the conclusion that controlling and measuring materials meaningful changes over four years did not lead to a significant change in the average test score of the results of the Unified State Exam in History since changing the form and content of a number of tasks did not change the elements of the knowledge, skills, and abilities being tested.
Key words: Unified State Exam in History, Volgograd region, controlling and measuring materials, level of graduate training, universal learning activities, causal relationships, systematization of historical information.
Citation. Piskunova E.P., Kuzibetskiy I.A. Analysis of the Dynamics of the Results of the Unified State Exam in History in the Volgograd Region in 2021–2024. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations], 2025, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 148-162. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2025.1.13.
Analysis of the Dynamics of the Results of the Unified State Exam in History in the Volgograd Region in 2021–2024 by Piskunova E.P., Kuzibetskiy I.A. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 5_Piskunova, Kuzibetskiy.pdfURL: https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/3600 | 31 Downloads |