KOMANDZHAEV A.N., MATSAKOVA N.P., KOMANDZHAEV E.A. On the Specificity of “Obligatory Relations” of the Kalmyks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.4.10

Aleksandr N. Komandzhaev

Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor, Head of the Department of History of Russia, Records Management and Archival Studies,

Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov,

Pushkina St., 11, 358000 Elista, Russian Federation

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7064-7315 

Natalya P. Matsakova

Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor, Department of History of Russia, Records Management and Archival Studies,

Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov,

Pushkina St., 11, 358000 Elista, Russian Federation

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8586-1632

Evgeniy A. Komandzhaev

Candidate of Sciences (Jurisprudence), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law,

Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov,

Pushkina St., 11, 358000 Elista, Russian Federation

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-8786


Abstract. The article is devoted to social interactions research, particularly to dependency relations in the Kalmyk society of the 17th–19th centuries in the context of a discussion about social structure of nomadic people. The scientific relevance of the research is due to the fact that these problems remain understudied and controversial. Nomadologists disagree on many issues of nomads’ social organization in general and individually that of the Kalmyks. There still remains some influence of former methods and social formation in the study of the Kalmyks’ social system. The analysis of law sources, especially the Mongol-Oirat laws of 1640, is particularly important. A given assessment of these laws served as the basis for ideas of many researchers. During the operational period of Ministerial committees, which were preparing the draft law on the abolition of dependency relations in the Kalmyk society, a consensus was formed: the essence of mandatory dependency of common Kalmyks is expressed as the right of Kalmyk upper classes to collect money from their dependent Kalmyks. As long as this law had the nature of a property, it could be concluded that its abolition needed to be rewarded. Obviously, the government understood and emphasized the difference between “mandatory relations” in the Kalmyk society from serfdom in the Russian countryside. Some researchers have turned their attention to the role of the Russian government in legal arrangements of Kalmyk privileged classes’ possessory interest, which in our opinion, resulted from its attempt to organize relations in the Kalmyk society by using “familiar” means and methods.

Key words: the Kalmyks, nomads, social relations, dependency, classes, serfdom, the Russian government.

Citation. Komandzhaev A.N., Matsakova N.P., Komandzhaev E.A. On the Specificity of “Obligatory Relations” of the Kalmyks. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4, Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations], 2017, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 109-119. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.4.10.

Лицензия Creative Commons

On the Specificity of “Obligatory Relations” of the Kalmyks by Komandzhaev A.N., Matsakova N.P., Komandzhaev E.A. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Attachments:
Download this file (Komandgaev_i_dr.pdf) Komandgaev_i_dr.pdf
URL: https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1446
422 Downloads